Afropundits

Misery at St. Anna

September 29, 2008 · 2 Comments

by Theloniousjay

Spike Lee is a master of his craft and one of the great storytellers of African-American experience. Yet, even the great ones catch an L sometimes.

Lee’s public spat with Clint Eastwood over the absence of African-Americans from his much-celebrated war dramas was the biggest promotional device for Miracle at St. Anna. Regardless of which side of the argument one fell on, expectations for Miracle were high, especially after taking on a so-called god of the industry. Justified as his beef is however (though I would argue less with Eastwood than with the Hollywood way in particular), I had a nagging suspicion that whatever Miracle would be, it wouldn’t be on a plane with other war epics – for better or for worse.

The sour relationship between Lee and the Hollywood guard is no secret, so when I read a Variety review of the film’s bow at Toronto, I figured that others might follow suit.  That particular reviewer seemed to take a bizarre pleasure in using the word ‘nigger’ in his assessment, although there is neither rampant usage of the epithet in the film nor is it one long ‘blame whitey’ tirade. Several other reviews I noticed, from traditional newspapers to black entertainment blogs all seemed to have their penknives drawn as well. How bad could it be?

It’s pretty bad.

Viewers assume that the characters they are meant to care about are the four men we follow in the Buffalo Soldiers regiment. However, there is less effort spent developing them than on the gaggle of Italian supporting characters they meet in the Tuscan countryside. Only in snippets of poorly-written dialogue are the soldiers’ feelings about their involvement in the war made evident. Conversely, the story of Angelo, the lad whom the soldiers encounter along the war path and who certainly plays a crucial role in the final moments, gets full treatment. Add this to the stories of two sparring Italian Partisans, father-daughter tensions, and general Nazi mania and you have a recipe for a disorienting narrative progression. And even as someone who doesn’t frequent many war flicks, there isn’t enough action to hold you through 160 minutes.

I actually don’t have that much of a gripe with the lack of, as the soldiers put it, ‘boom boom.’ American war epics have never been attractive to me, partly because I know as an historian that black contributions to every American conflict since the Revolutionary War (what up, Crispus Attucks!) have been overlooked. Additionally, my own taste for drama in films skews toward subtle, psychological thrills and less so pyrotechnics. But, especially as the sculpted head that plays talisman to the narrative is the result of a battle at Florence, more combat scenes would have grounded the film and solidified its place in the war film canon.

What excited me about Miracle, despite its letdowns in other areas, was its ability to present a brand new perspective on familiar events without simply being a black Patton. Through the film, you can see hints of the soldiers’ frustration with a country that denies them freedom in spite of their having fought and died to grant it to others. Especially in an Obama year, any reminder of past struggles serves as a tool to advance and evolve the black American narrative. Even with the difficulties Lee faced in finding funding for the film, I’m sure other black filmmakers will meet the challenge to bring the myriad other stories to light.

The film’s greatest accomplishment, then, is in its ability to inspire viewers to extract their own significance from it – but unfortunately, that’s the only one. You could read the Wikipedia entry for that.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , ,

Financial Crisis Blamed on Minorities

September 29, 2008 · Leave a Comment

by Zohra N.

Anyone who has their senses about them should know that redlining, defined best as a working form of institutional racism, was never good for America. (You can read the history of redlining here). In 1977, an act known as the  Community Reinvestment Act  was passed in attempt to allow for access to affordable housing. When Bill Clinton was president, his administration revised the act. Now that Act:

  1. requires strict numerical assessments to get a satisfactory CRA rating;
  2. uses federal home-loan data broken down by neighborhood, income group,
  3. encourages community groups to complain when banks do not loan enough to specified neighborhood, income group, and race
  4. allows community groups that market loans to targeted groups to collect a fee from the banks

Note that nowehere do the provisions ask for individuals with bad credit to receive mortgages. CRA calls for every creditworthy American to have access to affordable housing; that they have an equal opportunity to secure a mortgage.

Meet, from Minnesota, Rep Michele Bachmann, who I cannot stand and who the local indy media has likened to our very own Sarah Palin. Bachmann had this to say during a House Financial Services Committee hearing:

[President Bill Clinton] turned the two quasi-private, mortgage-funding firms into a semi-nationalized monopoly that dispensed cash to markets, made loans to large Democrat voting blocs and handed favors, jobs and money to political allies. This potential mix led inevitably to corruption and the Fannie-Freddie collapse.”

Loans started being made on the basis of race, and often little else.

One of our Afropundits, Beve had this to say:

Funny, I didn’t know blacks and minorities carried that much weight–enough to bring the largest economy in the world to its knees.

Below is a statement from the Congressional Black Caucus:

We write as members of the Congressional Black Caucus asking that you clarify your caucus position on minority lending being the cause of the current financial crisis … There is no evidence to support Rep. Bachmann’s assertion that “minorities” caused the current financial crisis. Laws designed to open opportunities for equal access to credit does not require banks or thrifts to make loans that are unsafe or unprofitable. In fact, laws like the CRA mandate exactly the opposite. The law stipulates that CRA lending activities must be done consistent with safe and sound banking practices. Additionally, research clearly shows that the majority of the predatory loans that have led us to this financial mess were originated by non-bank financial institutions and other entities that did NOT have a CRA obligation and lacked strong federal regulatory oversight. Shifting the blame for the current economic crisis to laws that allow equal access and opportunity to communities of color is ridiculous.

Bachmann should know that, save for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the banks that have gone under, or in the process of going bankrupt are not subject to CRA regulations. Read here.

Finally, if you get a chance, and would like to read in detail about housing in America, check out a great book: Capital and Communities in Black and White: The Intersections of Race, Class and Uneven Development by Gregory Squires. The book is a great insight on global and US economic disparities.

Categories: State Politics
Tagged: , ,